May 4th, 2013
16 days ago
The creation of ObamaCrapCare was a disaster, however, the authors of this abortion are making it worse by explicitly exempting themselves and their staff  from the garbage they wrote. If this is not the height of conceit, nothing is. They don’t want to be covered by the ill-conceived and executed health plan that they are foisting on us. This is not leadership, this is telling us that we have two classes of people in this country, them and us.

For those who think that ObamaCrapCare is so good, you need to ask yourself the following question: if it is such a wonderful development, why would the authors not want to be covered by it?  It does not take much thought!

We need to stop the funding of this program, otherwise, we will look back at the “good ole days” of great health insurance.

Conservative Tom



Lawmakers, aides may get Obamacare exemption

John Boehner (left) and Harry Reid are shown in a composite image. | AP Photos
The talks involve John Boehner and Harry Reid, among others. | AP Photos

Congressional leaders in both parties are engaged in high-level, confidential talks about exempting lawmakers and Capitol Hill aides from the insurance exchanges they are mandated to join as part of President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul, sources in both parties said.
The talks — which involve Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), the Obama administration and other top lawmakers — are extraordinarily sensitive, with both sides acutely aware of the potential for political fallout from giving carve-outs from the hugely controversial law to 535 lawmakers and thousands of their aides. Discussions have stretched out for months, sources said.

Text Size

  • -
  • +
  • reset

Can Obama govern?

Looking back on Bush, forward to Obama’s legacies

A source close to the talks says: “Everyone has to hold hands on this and jump, or nothing is going to get done.”
Yet if Capitol Hill leaders move forward with the plan, they risk being dubbed hypocrites by their political rivals and the American public. By removing themselves from a key Obamacare component, lawmakers and aides would be held to a different standard than the people who put them in office.
Democrats, in particular, would take a public hammering as the traditional boosters of Obamacare. Republicans would undoubtedly attempt to shred them over any attempt to escape coverage by it, unless Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) give Democrats cover by backing it.
There is concern in some quarters that the provision requiring lawmakers and staffers to join the exchanges, if it isn’t revised, could lead to a “brain drain” on Capitol Hill, as several sources close to the talks put it.
The problem stems from whether members and aides set to enter the exchanges would have their health insurance premiums subsidized by their employer — in this case, the federal government. If not, aides and lawmakers in both parties fear that staffers — especially low-paid junior aides — could be hit with thousands of dollars in new health care costs, prompting them to seek jobs elsewhere. Older, more senior staffers could also retire or jump to the private sector rather than face a big financial penalty.
Plus, lawmakers — especially those with long careers in public service and smaller bank accounts — are also concerned about the hit to their own wallets.
House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) is worried about the provision. The No. 2 House Democrat has personally raised the issue with Boehner and other party leaders, sources said.
“Mr. Hoyer is looking at this policy, like all other policies in the Affordable Care Act, to ensure they’re being implemented in a way that’s workable for everyone, including members and staff,” said Katie Grant, Hoyer’s communications director.
Several proposals have been submitted to the Office of Personnel Management, which will administer the benefits. One proposal exempts lawmakers and aides; the other exempts aides alone.
When asked about the high-level bipartisan talks, Michael Steel, a Boehner spokesman, said: “The speaker’s objective is to spare the entire country from the ravages of the president’s health care law. He is approached daily by American citizens, including members of Congress and staff, who want to be freed from its mandates. If the speaker has the opportunity to save anyone from Obamacare, he will.”
Reid’s office declined to comment about the bipartisan talks.
However, the idea of exempting lawmakers and aides from the exchanges has its detractors, including Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), a key Obamacare architect. Waxman thinks there is confusion about the content of the law. The Affordable Care Act, he said, mandates that the federal government will still subsidize and provide health plans obtained in the exchange. There will be no additional cost to lawmakers and Hill aides, he contends.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/obamacare-exemption-lawmakers-aides-90610.html#ixzz2RhcSFiK8

Conservative Musings

March 30th, 2013
51 days ago

I’m going to guess that Mark Shields, having been on TV for a million years, has more than a little money. Is he referring to himself? Via Newsbusters: MARK SHIELDS, PBS: I think it was G. K. Chesterton who said, “Wherever they are, the rich are the scum of the earth.” Actually, Chesterton said, “The [...]
Weasel Zippers

January 9th, 2013
131 days ago

George Soros predicts riots, police state and class war for America

Published: 25 January, 2012, 00:24
George Soros, Chairman of Soros Fund Management (AFP Photo / Brendan SMIALOWSKI)
Billionaire investor George Soros has a new prediction for America. While it might be as dire as it gets for the financial wiz, this bet concerns more than just the value of the buck. According to Soros, there’s about to be an all-out class war.
Soros, 81, previously bet against the British pound in the early 90s and made $ 1 billion off its collapse. In the years since, he’s remained active in investing, but also in advocacy. He’s helped keep Wikipedia afloat thanks to impressive contributions and through donations to the Tides Center, has indirectly funded Adbusters, the Canadian anti-capitalist magazine that put Occupy Wall Street on the map. Speaking to Newsweek recently, Soros neglected to acknowledge his past successes, but instead offered a word of warning: a period of “evil” is coming to the western world.
“I am not here to cheer you up. The situation is about as serious and difficult as I’ve experienced in my career,” Soros tells Newsweek. “We are facing an extremely difficult time, comparable in many ways to the 1930s, the Great Depression. We are facing now a general retrenchment in the developed world, which threatens to put us in a decade of more stagnation, or worse. The best-case scenario is a deflationary environment. The worst-case scenario is a collapse of the financial system.”
Soros goes on to compare the current state of the western world with what the Soviet Union was facing as communism crumbled. Although he would think that history would have taught the globe a thing or two about noticing trends, Soros says that, despite past events providing a perfect example of what is to come, the end of an empire seems imminent.
“The collapse of the Soviet system was a pretty extraordinary event, and we are currently experiencing something similar in the developed world, without fully realizing what’s happening,” adds Soros.
Soros goes on to say that as the crisis in the Eurozone only worsens, the American financial system will continue to be hit hard. On the way to a full-blown collapse, he cautions, Americans should expect society to alter accordingly. Riots will hit the streets, says Soros, and as a result, “It will be an excuse for cracking down and using strong-arm tactics to maintain law and order, which, carried to an extreme, could bring about a repressive political system, a society where individual liberty is much more constrained, which would be a break with the tradition of the United States.”
The recent adoption of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 and the proposed Enemy Expatriation Act, if approved, have already very well paved the way for such a society. Under the NDAA, the US government is allowed to indefinitely detain and torture American citizens suspected of terror crimes without ever bringing them to trial. Should lawmakers Joe Lieberman (I-CT) and Charles Dent (R-PA) get their Enemy Expatriation Act through Congress, the US will also be able to simply revoke citizenship without trial, essentially removing constitutional rights from anyone deemed a threat.
Others have cautioned that, as inequality becomes more rampant in America, the country’s citizens are becoming increasingly agitated with those on the other side of the extreme. In a recent survey released by the Pew Research Center, 66 percent of the adults studied believe that either “very strong” or “strong” conflicts exist between America’s elite and the impoverished, a statistic that has skyrocketed in recent years. Between 2009 and 20011, the proportion of those that sense conflicts exist as such between the class groups grew by 19 percentage points. While less than half of Americans fearing a fight brewing at the dawn of the Obama administration, today two-out-of-three Americans feel that there is a strong conflict between both extremes of society.
Addressing the issue of inequality, Soros tells Newsweek that the main issue that will make or break a reelection for US President Barack Obama will be whether or not the rich end up being taxed more. Among the current frontrunners in the Republic Party’s race for the GOP nomination, wealth and taxes have been of the biggest concern of party rivals. The top candidates have made millions off of investments, and at a time of immense inequality, represent what 99 percent of Americans don’t. Taxing the rich to a bigger degree might finally bring a chance, and Soros says, “It shouldn’t be a difficult argument for Obama to make.”
Soros adds that if the US manages to make it through the troubled times to come, it come allow the nation to enter another golden era. “In the crisis period, the impossible becomes possible. The European Union could regain its luster. I’m hopeful that the United States, as a political entity, will pass a very severe test and actually strengthen the institution,” he tells Newsweek.
With almost seven percent of Americans living below half of the poverty line, four unemployed Americans for each job, a shrinking middle class and an increasingly overzealous police state, it could very well be a tough road to get there, though.

Conservative Musings

January 4th, 2013
136 days ago

While being your own boss might seem like a dream come true, being self-employed these days is a serious tax nightmare. In 2010, the self-employed of the middle class were saddled with a 40.3% income tax rate. But following last night’s fiscal cliff debacle, the tax burden will now be even higher.

Why do the self-employed pay so much more in taxes? For starters, self-employed people have to pay double the FICA and Medicare expenses as other workers because payroll taxes typically paid by employers are swallowed by the self-employed.

With last night’s so-called “deal,” the self-employed middle class can expect an even higher tax burden in 2013. CNN contributor and former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer is tweeting out the warnings this morning:

Follow Meredith Jessup on Twitter

Follow Meredith Jessup on Facebook

Read more stories from TheBlaze

Boston Mayor Says Vice President ‘Guaranteed’ Him Obama Will Pass Major Gun Control Reform by End of January

Police Chief Bans Officers From Denny’s After Manager Tells Detective to Leave Her Gun in the Car or Leave

Hurricane Sandy Victim Who Hugged Obama in Viral Photo Claims He Broke Aid Promise, Sent Her ‘Disturbing’ Form Letter

‘Hannity’ Guest Becomes so Furious That He Literally Covers His Ears & Refuses to Respond During Heated Gun Rights Debate

Publish Gun Owners’ Info? Ann Coulter: Release The Records of Women Who Have Had Abortions, Too

TheBlaze.com – Blog

January 4th, 2013
136 days ago

An analysis of the so-called fiscal cliff deal reveals that earners making just $ 30,000 will take a bigger hit on their pay than those earning between $ 200,000 and $ 500,000:

Earners in the latter group will pay an average 1.3 percent more – or an additional $ 2,711 – in taxes this year, while workers making between $ 30,000 and $ 200,000 will see their paychecks shrink by as much as 1.7 percent – or up to $ 1,784 – the D.C.-based think tank reported.

Overall, nearly 80 percent of households will pay more money to the federal government as a result of the fiscal cliff deal.

“The economy needs a stimulus, but under the agreement, taxes will go up in 2013 relative to 2012 – not only on high-income households, as widely discussed, but also on every working man and woman in the country, via the end of the payroll tax cut,” said William G. Gale, co-director of the Tax Policy Center.

“For most households, the payroll tax takes a far bigger bite than the income tax does, and the payroll tax cut therefore – as [the Congressional Budget Office] and others have shown – was a more effective stimulus than income tax cuts were, because the payroll tax cuts hit lower in the income distribution and hence were more likely to be spent,” he added.

To calculate how the fiscal cliff deal will affect your taxes, click here.

Follow Meredith Jessup on Twitter

Follow Meredith Jessup on Facebook

Read more stories from TheBlaze

U.S. Marine’s Scathing Response to Sen. Feinstein’s Gun Control Proposal: ‘I Am Not Your Subject. I Am the Man Who Keeps You Free’

Iowa Paper Publishes Radical Anti-Gun Column: If People Refused to Give Up Their Guns, ‘Prying’ Them ‘From Their Cold, Dead Hands’ Works for Me

Police Chief Bans Officers From Denny’s After Manager Tells Detective to Leave Her Gun in the Car or Leave

Boston Mayor Says Vice President ‘Guaranteed’ Him Obama Will Pass Major Gun Control Reform by End of January

‘Hannity’ Guest Becomes so Furious That He Literally Covers His Ears & Refuses to Respond During Heated Gun Rights Debate

TheBlaze.com – Blog

December 12th, 2012
159 days ago

Via Washington Secrets: Democratic activist Van Jones and his group “Rebuild the Dream” is calling on the government to attack the rich and “Foreclose on the 1 percent.” But in helping President Obama assail the wealthy and pressure House Republicans, Jones is taking an unusual path–through artwork. “If we’re going to end this fiscal madness [...]
Weasel Zippers

December 3rd, 2012
168 days ago

Via ABC News: Republicans are seriously considering a Doomsday Plan if fiscal cliff talks collapse entirely. It’s quite simple: House Republicans would allow a vote on extending the Bush middle class tax cuts (the bill passed in August by the Senate) and offer the President nothing more: no extension of the debt ceiling, nothing on [...]
Weasel Zippers

November 27th, 2012
174 days ago

Here come the pinkie rings. Via The Hill: Hundreds of union members will be on Capitol Hill this week to lobby lawmakers to leave entitlements alone and let tax cuts for the wealthy expire. Starting Tuesday, AFL-CIO members from across the country will come to Washington to keep pressure on Congress as it enters negotiations [...]
Weasel Zippers

November 24th, 2012
177 days ago

Via Reason’s Peter Suderman: 8. Erase the entire Walton family fortune and you get an average $ 1/hour boost to Walmart workers. — Peter Suderman (@petersuderman) November 24, 2012 8. Erase the entire Walton family fortune and you get an average $ 1/hour boost to Walmart workers. — Peter Suderman (@petersuderman) November 24, 2012 More facts here…
Weasel Zippers

November 16th, 2012
185 days ago

They claim to be fighting for the middle class but they support a crushing tax hike on small business owners. Makes no sense whatsoever. Washington (CNN) – Several major labor unions are banding together to launch an ad campaign next week urging members of Congress to raise tax rates on the wealthiest Americans and to [...]
Weasel Zippers