May 16th, 2013
10 days ago

FacebookGoogle+RedditTwitterPinterestTumblrEmailShare

It wasn’t the most important thing that happened, but it is worth mocking the president for… having two U.S. marines hold umbrellas during a Rose Garden press conference with the Turkish prime minister.

It was the dismissive way in which Obama spoke about the marines that riled so many people:

I am going to go ahead and ask folks why don’t we get a couple of, uh, marines… they’re going to look good next to us cause I, uh, I’ve got a change of suits but I don’t know about uh, our prime, uh, prime minister.

And so… here’s the best of the satire:

 972320_609630632381184_228168873_n

306807_616631948366366_280514458_n

970106_10151514031662740_239523334_n

247729_609666335710947_238376711_n

970582_609634549047459_961435000_n

599293_500776623310705_626885359_n

954883_10152815670710368_2076109530_n

 

 

FacebookGoogle+RedditTwitterPinterestTumblrEmailShare


Capitol Commentary’s Daily News

April 23rd, 2013
33 days ago

If you thought the gruesome details spilling out from the ongoing Kermit Gosnell trial would temper Barack Obama’s extreme support for abortion, think again. 

The most pro abortion president to headline Planned Parenthood gala

On Thursday, President Obama and first lady Michelle will be the honored guests of the nation’s largest abortion provider at its annual gala. Ahead of the event, Planned Parenthood is celebrating the president and his support for their “business,” calling him the most pro-abortion president in history:

“President Obama has done more than any president in history for women’s health and rights,” Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards said in a statement announcing that Obama will deliver the keynote address at the organization’s “Time For Care” dinner in Washington. “We are honored to have President Obama join us…at this pivotal moment for women’s health.”

Richards also served as a surrogate for Obama’s reelection campaign, touting the president’s record on women’s issues during the heat of the race.

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, Dr. Ruth K. Westheimer and HBO’s “Girls” creator Lena Dunham will be honored the event.

Follow Meredith Jessup on Twitter

Follow Meredith Jessup on Facebook

Read more stories from TheBlaze

Beck Breaks Exclusive Information on Saudi National Once Considered a Person of Interest in Boston Bombings

Melissa Harris-Perry: Boston Bombing Suspects’ Islamic Faith Is as Irrelevant as Ben Affleck Movies in Investigation

‘Bible Is a Cheap Copy of the Koran’: Boston Bomber Suspect Allegedly Hurled Fiery Accusations About U.S. Foreign Policy and the Bible

Mayor Bloomberg: Interpretation of U.S. Constitution Will ‘Have to Change’ Following Boston Bombings

You Get ‘Paid’ for Being a Jerk: NY State Senator Goes After Piers Morgan in Tense Exchange Over Torture of Boston Bombing Suspect

TheBlaze.com – Blog

April 23rd, 2013
33 days ago

And so with much irony two more Muslims have been identified in a major terrorist attack.  Last week’s Boston Marathon bombing was masterminded by two Muslims from the Russian/Chechnya border and, today, two more Muslims were arrested in Canada and we were told by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police that these suspects wanted to blow up a bridge connecting a rail line between Canada and New York.  They apparently had planned to detonate the bomb while a train was crossing.

The death toll could have been over 1,000 depending upon how crowded the train was.

And yet we are told by the Obama administration and its employees that the threat is from “Right Wingers.”

There was an Obama administration generated report that said as much.

And in this 2009 interview Department of Homeland Security head Janet Napolitano explained why the term “terrorism” isn’t used any more:

SPIEGEL: Madame Secretary, in your first testimony to the US Congress as Homeland Security Secretary you never mentioned the word “terrorism.” Does Islamist terrorism suddenly no longer pose a threat to your country?

Napolitano: Of course it does. I presume there is always a threat from terrorism. In my speech, although I did not use the word “terrorism,” I referred to “man-caused” disasters. That is perhaps only a nuance, but it demonstrates that we want to move away from the politics of fear toward a policy of being prepared for all risks that can occur

.

It is ironic that even as DHS’ head said that back in 2009 there have been 5 successful attacks against the U.S. and 5 foiled attacks.

We know the various intelligence agents of the U.S are working hard and doing they best, it is with their politically appointed bosses that we take issue.  We saw the same type of ideological conflicts when Bill Clinton was in charge and that was a time of numerous deadly Islamic terrorist attacks against the U.S.

And yet, as this latest arrest in Canada shows, the Islamic terrorist threat is not going away.

But the Obama administration wants to extend a path to citizenship to over 10 million illegal immigrants.  People who oppose this are being called racists.  More and more Muslims are being caught as terrorists… where are those “Right Wing Extremists” the DHS devoted an entire report to back in 2009:

Johnson’s 2009 report, titled “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment,” warned that the election of America’s first black president coupled with an ailing economy would cause a resurgence in right-wing extremism, which Johnson spent 15 years studying.

While we’re not saying that a non-Muslim is not capable or will not commit an act of terrorism, the Boston Marathon bombing and this latest plot uncovered in Canada have one eerie similarity in common… Islamic terrorists.

The fact that the Obama administration has always tried so hard to steer away from the elephant in the room makes me think Islamists are not being taken as seriously as they should be… and people are dying as a result.

image

 

 

Share/Email


Capitol Commentary’s Daily News

April 2nd, 2013
54 days ago

Republican Strategist and CNN contributor David Frum is quite possibly the only person who thinks it would be a politically bad idea for Democrats to nominate the incredibly popular Hillary Clinton for president in 2016.

His reasoning: She’d make the party look too old… Continue reading »

April 2nd, 2013
54 days ago

Congratulations, President Obama is going to be President for another 20 years!  Before you have a heart attack, this is not true, however, it could be if a new bill introduced into Congress gets passed and 3/4 of the states approve it. Fortunately, the latter is a very hard hurdle to accomplish.

In the following article we see that this insanity is not limited to Democrats, Republicans also have proposed this insanity. This would be a disaster if either party put someone in office for more than 8 years. In fact, we like David Stockman’s proposal that all Presidents, Congressmen and Senators be limited to 6 years, total. Additionally, he would prevent any person who served in government to ever be a lobbyist.  We think he has it right.  

If you want to see more of Mr. Stockman’s proposals, see the following post: http://political-conservatives.blogspot.com/2013/03/stockman-on-economy-and-our-future.html     It will be time well spent.
Conservative Tom

New York congressman introduces bill to abolish presidential term limits

Patrick Howley

Investigative Reporter

 Democratic Rep. Jose Serrano reintroduced a bill in Congress on Friday to repeal the 22nd Amendment, which places term limits on the U.S. presidency.
The bill, which has been referred to committee, would allow Barack President Obama to become the first president since Franklin Roosevelt to seek a third term in office.
H.J. Res. 15 proposes “an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.”
The bill is a reintroduction of H.J. Res. 17, which Serrano introduced in Congress in January 2011. It was referred to the House judiciary committee, but did not make it to a floor vote.
Repealing the 22nd Amendment has been a longtime goal of Serrano’s, regardless of the sitting president’s political party. Serrano proposed similar resolutions in 1997 and 1999, during  Bill Clinton’s administration, and in 2001, 2003, 2005, and 2007, during George W. Bush’s administration. He proposed the repeal again in 2009 after Obama took office.
None of his proposals has ever made it to a floor vote.
Democratic Maryland Rep.  also repeatedly proposed repealing the 22nd Amendment during both the Clinton and Bush administrations.
Current Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell sponsored a bill to repeal the amendment in 1995.
The 22nd Amendment was passed by Congress in 1947 and ratified by 41 states by 1951. The last president before Roosevelt to prepare for a campaign for a third term was Woodrow Wilson, who pulled out of the 1920 nominating race to avoid deadlocking the Democratic convention in San Francisco.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/06/new-york-congressman-introduces-bill-to-abolish-presidential-term-limits/#ixzz2PJ5ePBCe

Conservative Musings

March 16th, 2013
71 days ago

It is rare that a President is an example of an entire generation, however, that is Obama. He is a selfish, self indulgent, spoiled individual not unlike the Gen X generation. American baby boomers have created a very irresponsible generation and they are no different from   those who continue to vote for him. Will they lead to the end of the United States?

A country declines when its citizens substitute individual responsibility for the benefits that its government can provide. Initially, the role reversal is hardly felt however, over time it erodes the spirit that built the nation until the time that only a few are taking care of the rest. Such is the case since 1950. The number of people who are on some sort of welfare has grown significantly over this period for example. Should we expect that it will decrease anytime soon, doubtful.

What are we do to? We would like you to tell us what your prescription is.

Conservative Tom

Obama Is Spoiled Rotten

March 13, 2013 by  
Obama Is Spoiled Rotten
OFFICIAL WHITE HOUSE PHOTO BY PETE SOUZA
“Spare the rod, spoil the child.” – Samuel Butler
Last week, Vanity Fair published an adaptation of Zev Chafets’ biography of FOX News President Roger Ailes, in which Ailes described President Barack Obama as “lazy.”
Ailes may be correct in saying that Obama “never worked a day in his life.” Yet I do not believe that the President is lazy. I think Obama was spoiled rotten by his mother and her parents and that he has continued to be spoiled rotten by overly adoring liberals.
The real Obama clearly expressed himself in 2008 when he became exasperated by reporters after a news conference: “Come on! I just answered, like, eight questions.”
Sorry, Obama, for thinking it was anyone’s job to ask you questions.
Obama is the last person in the room to be sorry about anything. (There is plenty to be learned about Obama in Richard Minter’s recent book Leading From Behind: The Reluctant President and the Advisors Who Decide for Him.)
According to White House records, the President was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, on Aug. 4, 1961. That makes him a member of Generation X, those born between 1960 and 1984.
What makes many of that generation so special is that they are born to baby boomers, who rejected raising their children the way generations of Americans had raised theirs. The baby boom went bust when they overindulged and spoiled their kids.
Raised by a single mother who was taking college classes, our 44th President had zero contact with his father. Instead, he found himself with his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who was “finding herself” while traveling the world and continually going to college. When he was 10, Obama’s mother left him with his doting maternal grandparents.
Obama was not spoiled by money but by attention and adulation. One of only a handful of black kids at his high school in Hawaii, he was given extra merit for his intelligence. It seems clear that his grandparents, teachers and fellow students fawned over him, giving him an exaggerated sense of self.
Social scientists say that our basic personality is shaped at an early age. I have found that to be true. If we turn out to be kindhearted, industrious or insolent at 50, our behavior is cemented at a young age. In this regard Obama exhibits the personality of the peevish boy that he was while growing up.
On Jan. 27, New Republic published an interview with Obama.
One question asked was:
It seems as if you’re relying more on executive orders to get around these problems. You’ve done it for gun control, for immigration. Has your view on executive authority changed now that you’ve been president for four years?
Obama responded:
… [T]here are certain issues where a judicious use of executive power can move the argument forward or solve problems that are of immediate-enough import that we can’t afford not to do it. And today, just to take an example, the notion that we wouldn’t be collecting information on gun violence just to understand how it happens, why it happens, what might reduce it–that makes no sense. …
Clearly, Obama sees things his way: the way a 5-year-old sees a Tonka truck.
The Telegraph summed up Obama’s leadership qualities:
President Obama sees his re-election as a mandate to continue the very policies that will eventually bankrupt the country unless they are reversed, regardless of huge opposition on Capitol Hill. It chimes closely with the president’s second inaugural address…, which offered absolutely no olive branches to the nearly 61 million Americans who voted for his opponent in November.
It wouldn’t be hard to fill a book on Obama’s self-centeredness. When Neil Armstrong died in August, the President posted a picture of himself looking up at the moon. What should have been a President talking about the greatness of an American hero became another self-aggrandizing moment by Obama.
How Dr. Spock Ruined America
I will wager that Obama never got a spanking. His upbringing is the kind that is on constant display; the baby boomers of my age were bound and determined to never use discipline on their children. Instead, they praised their children as being “special.” When those kids acted up, they begged and pleaded with them to be good.
I was hardly “Father Knows Best.” Most of the credit for the way our children turned out goes to their mother. But I won’t shy away from the fact that I did administer spankings to our kids on rare occasions, just as my parents did with me and my siblings.
Today, our children are 25, 28 and 30 years old. They all have good jobs, live independently and, in their adult years, have thanked me for the discipline they got.
What earned a spanking? A clear example was our eldest. When he was 4 we took him to the Seattle Zoo. As we got to our car, he got this strange look on his face and immediately bolted into traffic. I yelled, “Stop!” He kept going and reached a lane where there was an oncoming car approaching at 30 mph. The fact that I was then young saved his life.
When pregnant with that child my wife read what millions of baby boomers read: Baby and Child Care by Benjamin Spock, M.D.
If you ever thought Spock was a plethora of knowledge, think again. In 1989, while revising that book, he wrote: “I visited a small private school… with the idea of asking children… what advice to parents they’d like me to incorporate in the forthcoming revision of Baby and Child Care. … In a thoughtful mood, the class was unanimous that parents should not hit their children.”
I am shocked! What is next: recruits in the Marine Corp will say they don’t like PT?
Look around and you can see bratty behavior on display. (Shopping malls come to mind.) And kids don’t grow out of it. I have a friend that consults for a college football team. He tells me that sometimes parents call up the head coach at the university and question him as to why their son isn’t playing more.
There was a CBC TV documentary two years ago about post-baby boomers. It included a segment where parents phoned bosses of their 20-something children to complain that Johnny and Sally were not being treated fairly at work. The program concluded that spoiling children took off with Generation X.
Obama is not the only one in government who was spoiled. The ranks of Congress are also becoming filled with the overindulged and pampered prodigy of the baby boomer generation.
In today’s Congress, there are 115 members who belong to Generation X. While the average age of Congress is high by historical standards, its ranks are being filled by people who did not suffer events like the Great Depression and World War II. I don’t doubt that most of these members are intelligent and capable. I doubt many of them faced much hardship or discipline. They continue to demonstrate that they simply can’t “play nice” with others.
Yours in good times and bad,

Conservative Musings

March 5th, 2013
82 days ago

Prominent conservative columnist Cal Thomas writes on CPAC “rejecting” New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie as a speaker (via FoxNews.com):

By not inviting him to speak, CPAC invites comparison with a pessimistic and hypercritical political environment of the past. If the Republican “tent” isn’t large enough for Chris Christie, then it will resemble a pup tent for some time to come.

Republicans should be focused on deconstructing failed liberalism and styling their alternative in positive terms, not rejecting one of their own. Hating President Obama is not a policy. Intellectually defeating his policies is.

CPAC, the largest annual gathering of conservative voters, is Mar. 14-16. Organizers for the event have been widely criticized for their decision to… Continue reading »